top of page

Can You Recover Compensation If You Were Partially at Fault for an Accident in California?

Writer: SEO 7figures
SEO 7figures
Sep 23
2 min read

California uses a pure comparative fault system, which means accident victims may be entitled to recover compensation even if they were partially responsible for the crash. Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault, but it is not eliminated. If you were injured in a Los Angeles accident and are concerned about shared fault, a California personal injury attorney can evaluate the facts and help counter unfair fault assignments by the other party's insurer. See our personal injury FAQ for additional guidance.

What Is Pure Comparative Fault and How Does It Work in California?

California Civil Code Section 1431.2 establishes a "pure" comparative fault rule for personal injury cases. Under this framework, each party to an accident is assigned a percentage of fault that reflects their contribution to causing the crash. An injured party's total recoverable damages are then reduced by their own percentage of fault. Critically, California's system is "pure" - it does not bar recovery no matter how high the plaintiff's fault percentage, unlike the modified comparative or contributory negligence systems used in other states.

This framework applies to most motor vehicle accidents, slip-and-fall cases, and other tort claims in California. It means that even if you made a traffic error that contributed to your accident, you may still be entitled to meaningful compensation from the party whose fault was greater.

How Do Insurance Companies Handle Shared Fault After a California Accident?

Insurance adjusters are trained to shift as much fault as possible onto the injured claimant to minimize the payout. They may point to your speed, following distance, position in the lane, or reaction time as evidence of contributory fault. These arguments are common even in cases where the other driver bore primary responsibility. The adjusters' fault assignment directly affects any settlement offer they make, and their initial assessment is almost always a starting point for negotiation rather than a final determination.

Attorney Hosseini's experience on both the plaintiff and defense sides of personal injury cases gives Opal Law Group insight into how insurers build comparative fault arguments - and how to effectively challenge them. Review her approach on the attorney profile page.

What Should You Do After a Shared-Fault Accident in Los Angeles?

Document the scene thoroughly before leaving. Photograph all vehicle positions, roadway markings, traffic signals, and physical damage. Avoid apologizing or making statements that acknowledge fault to anyone at the scene. Request a police report and cooperate with the responding officer's documentation. Seek medical attention the same day, even if injuries seem minor, as delayed treatment is one of the most common tools insurers use to reduce or deny claims in shared-fault scenarios.

Do not accept a settlement offer from the at-fault driver's insurer without first consulting an attorney who can evaluate whether the proposed fault split is fair. Schedule a free case evaluation with Opal Law Group before signing any release.

Frequently Asked Questions


 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page